作者简介：李勇坚，1975年1月出生。2003年在中国社会科学院研究生院获经济学博士学位。学科专业为西方经济学，指导教师是刘树成研究员。 摘 要 自Romer1986年发表其具有划时代意义的论文以来，经济增长理论又一次成为了宏观经济学所研究的中心。在过去的十多年中，经济学家发展了大量关于知识与增长的模型。本文对知识与增长的理论模型进行了一些理论梳理。 本文以知识与增长之间的关系为主线，对知识引入内生增长模型后的各种模型进行了分析。本文作者认为，知识的性质是知识与增长模型的关键。本文在第2部分从经济学的角度对知识的定义与知识的性质进行分析，第3 部分对引进知识的非竞争性与部分排他性后的第一代内生增长模型进行了分析。如果考虑到知识的创造性破坏作用，而不单纯是正的外在性，则产生了Neo-Schumpeterian增长模型，本文第4部分对其进行了重点介绍；在引进知识的非竞争性与外在性之后，将产生规模效应，对于这个问题进行研究的是在九十年代末期发展起来的非规模效应增长模型，本文在第5部分对于非规模效应模型的逻辑基础及其基本假定进行了分析；如果考虑到垄断租作为创新的激励，则必须研究市场结构与内生增长之间关系的模型，本文在第6部分对于各种市场结构下的创新与增长模型进行了研究；在本文的第7、8、9、10、11部分，还研究了基于人力资本与知识交互作用的内生增长模型、由于不同的假定条件而产生的一般目的技术（GPT）与增长模型、内生增长模型中的多均衡与不确定性、知识扩散与内生增长之间关系的模型、以知识为基础的内生增长模型的政策含义等。本文对于内生增长理论的上述研究从中文文献的角度来说是首次。 最后，在本文的第12部分，还对以知识为基础的内生增长模型进行了简要评论。 关键字：知识　内生增长　Neo-Schumpeterian 规模效应　 ABSTRACT Economic growth is the term economists use to describe the growth in output from an economy. Beginning with the seminal work of Romer (1986), The relations between knowledge and economic growth have been the major topic of macroeconomics since mid of 1980’s. It is beyond the scope of this paper to present an exhaustive discussion of growth theory. The aim of this paper is to explain how economists try to understand the relations of economic growth and knowledge. To make the task manageable, the focus is on major issues and the models of endogenous growth which include knowledge. The paper is organized as follows. We introduce the developing of endogenous growth theory from view of the knowledge and growth in section. We begin our discussion in Section 2 by expositing the definition and the nature of knowledge in economics In section 3,we set out some basic generic models and show how it yields some key models that have played a prominent role in the recent literature on economic growth models based knowledge. The base of these models is that knowledge has the nature of non-rival and partly non-exclude. The first generation endogenous growth models discussed in section 3 didn't consider the. The Neo-Schumpeterian growth models discussed in section 4, which represent developing of the endogenous growth models in future, base on the effect of creative destroy. In these models, growth is primarily driven by a sequence of quality-improving innovations each of which destroys the rents generated by previous innovations. The initial models discussed in section 3 and section 4 had the characteristic that the economy has scale effect. This is clearly a limitation. Criticisms of these endogenous growth models have led to the development of the non-scale model. Section 5 discusses the non-scale models. The advantage of such models is that they are consistent with the experiments research. From this standpoint, non-scale growth models should be viewed as being the norm, rather than the exception. In this view of point, these models are in many aspects a hybrid of endogenous and neoclassical models. In the endogenous growth models, the incentive of innovations is the monopoly rent of innovation. The models of market structure and endogenous growth provide important insights into this relationship. In section 6, we research this kind of models. Some important issues about knowledge and growth is researched in the rest of the paper. In section 8 the endogenous growth models including multiple balanced growth equilibria and indeterminacy is discussed. In section 9, the endogenous growth models including knowledge spillovers. In section 10, the endogenous growth models including general purpose technologies (GPTs). In section 11, the policy issue of the knowledge and endogenous growth models. In section 12, the author reviewed briefly the knowledge-based endogenous growth models. Key Words: KNOWLEDGE, ENDOGENOUS GROWTH, NEO-SCHUMPETERIAN, SCALE-EFFECT